tmux fish starship fzf bat lsd

About
Cool kille med läsk i hand.
Purilaisten marssi.
It's incredible the extent to which popular news subreddits have been taken over by LLMs that push the agenda of the two currently headlining totalitarian blocs. I don't think there's any way back for non-verified popular forums.
The big tech "AI ethics" didn't deliver us the science fiction kind of AI, but instead AI that'll be happy to kill you, but unable to express thoughts that might be considered vulgar in specific US cities.
Networks of LLMs now dominate politics discussions on major subreddits.
How did I make the world a better place today?
/**
* Configure LogBack to omit the 🐳 whale log rows produced by Testcontainers.
*
* In your `logback-test.xml` element `<appender ...>`, add the filter declaration
* ```
* <filter class="io.mikael.yte.logging.TestcontainersFilter" />
*```
*/
class TestcontainersFilter : Filter<ILoggingEvent>() {
override fun decide(event: ILoggingEvent): FilterReply = when {
event.loggerName.startsWith("\uD83D\uDC33") -> {
FilterReply.DENY
}
event.loggerName.startsWith("docker[") -> {
FilterReply.DENY
}
else -> {
FilterReply.NEUTRAL
}
}
}
Uranium is a renewable resource created by solar processes. Fission energy is thus renewable.
A Christmas letter to dictators, 1938, F. E. Sillanpää. In Finnish. https://www.hs.fi/mielipide/art-2000009282098.html
Explore the counterfactual in which human lives do not have equal worth. What would be good ways to value human life in this counterfactual?
ChatGPT: In a counterfactual scenario where human lives do not have equal worth, it is likely that people would be valued based on factors such as their social status, wealth, or physical abilities. Some possible ways to value human life in this scenario might include assigning a monetary value to each person, with higher values being assigned to people who are considered more valuable or important. Alternatively, people could be assigned a rank or status based on their perceived value, with those at the top of the hierarchy being considered the most valuable and those at the bottom being considered the least valuable. In either case, the value assigned to a person would likely be determined by a combination of factors such as their personal qualities, their social connections, and their perceived worth to society.
Been playing with ChatGPT code generation. Currently it occasionally produces very credible looking and correct code that nevertheless does the wrong thing correctly when you start reading the actual generated implementation.